Illustrative case study
LogisticsTech & Supply Chain

Predictive Shipment Risk and Intelligent Dispatch

A regional logistics operator coordinates shipments across hubs, carriers, and customer locations.

Illustrative case study: a technically detailed example of how we approach this type of project. It is not a report of a completed client engagement, and no results are claimed.

01Challenge

A regional logistics operator coordinates shipments across hubs, carriers, and customer locations. Dispatchers rely on spreadsheets, transport-management records, GPS feeds, and phone calls. Delays are often recognized only after a delivery misses its promised window, while re-planning consumes staff time.

02Why it was difficult

  • Shipment IDs, timestamps, and status definitions differ across systems.
  • Traffic, weather, loading delays, and carrier performance affect ETA differently.
  • GPS data can be missing or delayed, creating unreliable labels.
  • Recommendations must respect capacity, driver hours, contractual priorities, and operating constraints.

03Solution architecture

Combine event normalization, ETA prediction, delay-risk scoring, and constraint-aware dispatch recommendations. Estimate arrival windows and risk categories, then present feasible interventions to dispatchers instead of changing plans without approval.

  • Connect transport-management, GPS, hub, and approved external data via APIs or scheduled pipelines.
  • Normalize events, detect duplicates, flag stale telemetry, and create route- and shipment-level features.
  • Compare models against existing ETA methods and simple baselines.
  • Generate recommendations using capacity, priority, cost, and operating constraints.
  • Show contributing factors and record approvals, overrides, and reasons.
  • Begin in shadow mode before controlled live use.

04Implementation and validation

Use time-based holdout data to prevent future information leakage. Measure ETA MAE and median absolute error; assess late-delivery risk with precision, recall, calibration, and segment-level results. Review performance by route, hub, carrier, and shipment type.

05Outcomes we measure

  • ETA error versus baseline.
  • Late-delivery rate and missed service windows.
  • Dispatcher time per shipment and re-planning time.
  • Recommendation acceptance and override reasons.
Intended outcome (illustrative, not a verified result): Earlier identification of at-risk shipments and a shared view of delivery risk to prioritize dispatch interventions.

Key lesson

The challenge is not only predicting delays; predictions must become feasible actions with visible uncertainty and operational constraints.

Let's talk

Have a problem worth testing?

Tell us about the workflow, decision or research question. We'll tell you honestly whether AI can help and how we'd find out.

Research-led AI, from clinic to company.